-
Making the Brazilian ATR-72 Spin
by
[sc name=”post_comments” ][/sc]
Note: This story was corrected on August 10th at 10:23 am, thanks to the help of a sharp-eyed reader.
Making an ATR-72 Spin
I wasn’t in Brazil on Friday afternoon, but I saw the post on Twitter or X (or whatever you call it) showing a Brazil ATR-72, Voepass Airlines flight 2283, rotating in a spin as it plunged to the ground near Sao Paulo from its 17,000-foot cruising altitude. All 61 people aboard perished in the ensuing crash and fire. A timeline from FlightRadar 24 indicates that the fall only lasted about a minute, so the aircraft was clearly out of control. Industry research shows Loss of Control in Flight (LOCI) continues to be responsible for more fatalities worldwide than any other kind of aircraft accident.
The big question is why the crew lost control of this airplane. The ADS-B data from FlightRadar 24 does offer a couple of possible clues. The ATR’s speed declined during the descent rather than increased, which means the aircraft’s wing was probably stalled. The ATR’s airfoil had exceeded its critical angle of attack and lacked sufficient lift to remain airborne. Add to this the rotation observed, and the only answer is a spin.
Can a Large Airplane Spin?
The simple answer is yes. If you induce rotation to almost any aircraft while the wing is stalled, it can spin, even an aircraft as large as the ATR-72. By the way, the largest of the ATR models, the 600, weighs nearly 51,000 pounds.
Of course, investigators will ask why the ATR’s wing was stalled. It could have been related to a failed engine or ice on the wings or tailplane. (more…)
-
How the FAA Let Remote Tower Technology Slip Right Through Its Fingers
by
[sc name=”post_comments” ][/sc]
In June 2023, the FAA published a 167-page document outlining the agency’s desire to replace dozens of 40-year-old airport control towers with new environmentally friendly brick-and-mortar structures. These towers are, of course, where hundreds of air traffic controllers ply their trade … ensuring the aircraft within their local airspace are safely separated from each other during landing and takeoff.
The FAA’s report was part of President Biden’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act enacted on November 15, 2021. That bill set aside a whopping $25 billion spread across five years to cover the cost of replacing those aging towers. The agency said it considered a number of alternatives about how to spend that $5 billion each year, rather than on brick and mortar buildings.
One alternative addressed only briefly before rejecting it was a relatively new concept called a Remote Tower, originally created by Saab in Europe in partnership with the Virginia-based VSATSLab Inc. The European technology giant has been successfully running Remote Towers in place of the traditional buildings in Europe for almost 10 years. One of Saab’s more well-known Remote Tower sites is at London City Airport. London also plans to create a virtual backup ATC facility at London Heathrow, the busiest airport in Europe.
A remote tower and its associated technology replace the traditional 60-70 foot glass domed control tower building you might see at your local airport, but it doesn’t eliminate any human air traffic controllers or their roles in keeping aircraft separated.
Max Trescott photo Inside a Remote Tower Operation
In place of a normal control tower building, the airport erects a small steel tower or even an 8-inch diameter pole perhaps 20-40 feet high, similar to a radio or cell phone tower. Dozens of high-definition cameras are attached to the new Remote Tower’s structure, each aimed at an arrival or departure path, as well as various ramps around the airport.
Using HD cameras, controllers can zoom in on any given point within the camera’s range, say an aircraft on final approach. The only way to accomplish that in a control tower today is if the controller picks up a pair of binoculars. The HD cameras also offer infrared capabilities to allow for better-than-human visuals, especially during bad weather or at night.
The next step in constructing a remote tower is locating the control room where the video feeds will terminate. Instead of the round glass room perched atop a standard control tower, imagine a semi-circular room located at ground level. Inside that room, the walls are lined with 14, 55-inch high-definition video screens hung next to each other with the wider portion of the screen running top to bottom.
After connecting the video feeds, the compression technology manages to consolidate 360 degrees of viewing area into a 220-degree spread across the video screens. That creates essentially the same view of the entire airport that a controller would normally see out the windows of the tower cab without the need to move their head more than 220 degrees. Another Remote Tower benefit is that each aircraft within visual range can be tagged with that aircraft’s tail number, just as it might if the controller were looking at a radar screen. (more…)
-
Airline Pilots and the Rest of Us
by
[sc name=”post_comments” ][/sc]
An airline pilot career has a few more thorns sticking out of it these days. Pay scales are down, duty days are longer, schedules stink and passengers are easily riled. But even with all that said, I still think it makes for a pretty incredible career.
The airline pilot profession has evolved since 9/11 with a few twists I still don’t understand though. Perhaps you do.
Most airline pilots began their careers learning to fly in much smaller general aviation airplanes and sometimes business jets as charter and corporate pilots before they made it to American, or Continental or AirTran.
So to me, it would seem proper to give little airplanes – sorry, anything smaller than a 737 is little to most airline folks – their due.
Yesterday’s Washington Post ran a Letter to the Editor by former ALPA president Duane Woerth in which he made it clear that some ALPA pilots support the airline’s and the FAA’s perspective that business aviation airplanes are the root of the airline’s problems.
“The most critical issues in the public debate on airline and airport delays are first, that most of these delays that frustrate consumers are airspace delays and not airport delays or even airline-caused delays,” Woerth said. “And second, the huge contribution to airspace congestion of corporate aircraft. Why is the effect of corporate aircraft on congestion so often disregarded?” Woerth also wonders.
In a way, this perspective from an airline pilot really isn’t a great shock to me. After all, their companies do own these people.
-
Business Aviation Should be Afraid … Very Afraid
by
[sc name=”post_comments” ][/sc]
News last week from the White House that even George Bush has finally run out of excuses to avoid admitting the U.S. aviation system is in need of serious reform should actually not come as much of a shock.
The Business Travel Coalition’s chairman Kevin Mitchell confirmed the increased drum beat from the White House in both recent testimony before Congress as well as in a Chicago Tribune article. “The summer of 2000 was always considered the summer from hell. But it was nothing like this summer on so many different levels.”
But anyone with a little history here will tell you the White House sticking its nose into any industry is never a good thing, especially an administration that tends to shoot first and ask questions later.
A note that also emerged last week from the Air Transport Association about the administration’s future efforts is what really sent shivers up my spine however. Everyone who operates a business airplane should be worried too.
The ATA news release on September 27th was short and sweet. “ATA appreciates the involvement of the White House and the DOT in what is becoming an increasingly serious national crisis of flight delays.” Speaking to the subject of a planned Aviation Rule Committee (ARC), ATA added that, “we will advocate strongly for measures to maximize capacity to meet consumer demand.”
Since business aviation has been the prime punching bag of the airlines for the past 18 months, I can only believe this means things are going to get even worse. ATA has spent over $11 million in just the first seven months of this year in attacks on business aviation.
We’ve known folks at the FAA level clearly supported the airlines in the past. “They’re joined at the hip in this food fight,” said AOPA’s Phil Boyer. But now the ATA and the White House are cooking something up together. And that can’t be good for any of us who operate airplanes for business I guarantee that, despite the White House
occasionally pointing a finger at the airlines. (more…)
-
Can You Name the Mercury Seven Astronauts?
by
[sc name=”post_comments” ][/sc]
Despite the private e-mail tongue lashing I took for my comments a few weeks back about the need to retire the Shuttle, I’m pretty fond of the concept of space flight. Even at my advanced age, I’d be at the Kennedy Space Center in a heartbeat if they’d let me tag along.
I was a kid – really little – when Sputnik launched and began the space race that culminated with America’s arrival on the moon aboard Apollo 11 in 1969.
Nostalgically then, I offer this shot of the original Mercury Seven – the first group of American astronauts detailed in The Right Stuff many years back.
So here’s the deal.
Name the astronauts from left to right(last name is fine) and you’ll win a copy of a Professional Pilot Career Guide. I’ll cover the postage and even autograph the book telling all your friends how incredibly smart you are … as well as old.
Just remember the U.S. Postal system is not fast. And we do NOT provide the magnifying glasses to old folks with eye sight numbers in the hundreds, so no complaints about the size of the photo.
And finally, no private e-mails this time.
If you know who these astounding young men are, climb out on a limb and show us right here in front of all your friends!
Technorati tags: NASA, Mercury astronauts, Cape Kennedy, Space Shuttle, pilots, Apollo, Gemini, The Right Stuff